France, Education, And Work

Artificial Intelligence makes the world talk about it all the time. Some are afraid of losing their jobs. Others believe in a better good. Some think that they are able to control it. Or maybe we are living in the Matrix. We will never find the right answer. But if it is a Matrix Universe, then you should chill, rest, and gamble with the online casino via our link

French Education

Luc Behaghel, a representative of the Paris School of Economics, in his analysis of the changes that have occurred within the French market over the past 40 years, draws two main conclusions. From this one can see, especially, why we’d like feminism. If 40 years ago the economically active population of France was only 6 million people, of which only 10% were women, now France features a 30 million economically active population of which half are women. Also, compared with the days 40 years ago, the extent of education has greatly increased. There are 5 times more people with incomplete education or a baccalaureate than then. It is often thanks to the very fact that within the 80s France was ruled by socialists. They administered a reform of upper education. It diversified the specialties offered by universities, and therefore the so-called baccalauréats professionals were also introduced. This is something like higher professional education for easy people. It has indeed led to the exclusion of an enormous number of children from the market. In France, alongside Spain and Italy, the very best percentage of unemployed was among children.

Work Less Or More?

Another observed pattern was that over the past 40 years, the French began to work less, but the productivity of labor has increased. Also, the continued policy of decentralization made it possible to avoid the absorption by Paris of all the country’s most precious resources. Regional centers like Lyon, and Bordeaux emerged. They’re also connected to Paris by a network of high-speed railways.

At an equivalent time, the subsequent polarization is observed. If highly qualified workers are in demand by the market. the innovations being introduced don’t have a negative impact. Then the less qualified ones suffer from the introduction of innovations. While the introduction of innovations, on the contrary, doesn’t have a negative impact on the unskilled market, the necessity for unskilled labor is usually still growing.

From these observations (and this is often not the entire analysis), we will draw the subsequent conclusions. Since the active involvement of girls within the market has led to a decrease in the birth rate. Migrants will still be imported, since, as we see, the necessity for unskilled labor won’t go anywhere. The center class is expecting further die-offs because the introduction of technology makes it unnecessary. Inequality will only increase because the market now needs a really small number of very qualified employees. And an enormous amount of unskilled ones are needed. Respectively, the necessity for education will decrease generally. Since only the highest education will have value. it’ll provide a pass to privileged offers, everything else will go browsing. High-skilled people will enjoy the introduction of AI, also as low-skilled people. But the center class will lose. In general, for many people within the West, the free life is over.